Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd & Ors
The outcome of the non-technical trial will not affect the incidence of costs attributable to the technical trial, as the issues of validity, essentiality, and infringement determined in Trial A are sufficiently distinct and final for costs purposes. Therefore, the ordinary order should be made: the unsuccessful party (defendants) pays the successful party's (claimant's) costs for Technical Trial A.
- Parties
- Claimant: Unwired Planet International Limited; Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co., Limited; Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co., Limited; Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Limited; Defendant: Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited; Defendant: Google Inc.; Defendant: Google Ireland Limited; Defendant: Google Commerce Limited; Ninth Party: Unwired Planet, Inc.; Tenth Party: Unwired Planet LLC; Eleventh Party: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Patent and Competition Law / Post Trial Costs Determination Following Technical Trial
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of claimant; permission to appeal granted on certain grounds.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Patent Infringement, FRAND Licensing, Costs Orders, Split Trials, Competition Law Defences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unwired Planet International Limited
Claimant
Huawei Technologies Co., Limited
Defendant
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co., Limited
Defendant
Samsung Electronics Co., Limited
Defendant
Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited
Defendant
Google Inc.
Defendant
Google Ireland Limited
Defendant
Google Commerce Limited
Defendant
Unwired Planet, Inc.
Ninth Party
Unwired Planet LLC
Tenth Party
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Eleventh Party
Procedural Posture
Patent and Competition Law / Post Trial Costs Determination Following Technical Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate costs order following technical patent trial in context of ongoing competition law and FRAND issues
- 2 Whether to reserve costs pending outcome of non-technical trial
- 3 Application of discretion in costs under CPR 44.2
Ratio Decidendi
The outcome of the non-technical trial will not affect the incidence of costs attributable to the technical trial, as the issues of validity, essentiality, and infringement determined in Trial A are sufficiently distinct and final for costs purposes. Therefore, the ordinary order should be made: the unsuccessful party (defendants) pays the successful party's (claimant's) costs for Technical Trial A.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of claimant; permission to appeal granted on certain grounds.
Orders
- Defendants to pay claimant's costs attributable to Technical Trial A, to be assessed if not agreed.
- Defendants to make an interim payment to claimant of £1,270,800 by 4 p.m. on 20 January 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment