MediaTek Inc & Ors v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 649 (Pat) (18 March 2025)
The English court has jurisdiction to try the FRAND, patent infringement, and validity claims as there is a real and substantial connection to the UK, including MediaTek's UK presence and alleged acts. The Chinese proceedings do not resolve the global or UK-specific issues, and there is a real prospect of success on the merits. The anti-trust claim as pleaded is not sustainable and is struck out. Permission is granted to amend the pleadings and to rely on expert evidence of Chinese law. The applications to set aside service and stay the proceedings are dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 649 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: MediaTek, Inc; Claimant: HFI Innovation, Inc; Claimant: MTK Wireless Limited; Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd; Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Patent/frand/competition / Interlocutory Applications (jurisdiction, Strike Out, Amendment, Service, Expert Evidence)
- Outcome
- Jurisdiction applications and stay dismissed; anti-trust claim struck out; permission to amend and rely on expert evidence granted.
- Legal Topics
- Standard Essential Patents (seps), FRAND Licensing, Patent Infringement, Patent Validity, Jurisdiction, Abuse of Dominant Position, Anti Trust, Cross Licensing, Declaratory Relief, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MediaTek, Inc
Claimant
HFI Innovation, Inc
Claimant
MTK Wireless Limited
Claimant
Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd
Defendant
Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent/frand/competition / Interlocutory Applications (jurisdiction, Strike Out, Amendment, Service, Expert Evidence)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction to determine FRAND and patent claims between MediaTek and Huawei
- 2 Whether the claims should be struck out or stayed due to parallel Chinese proceedings
- 3 Whether MediaTek's claims for abuse of dominant position are sustainable
Ratio Decidendi
The English court has jurisdiction to try the FRAND, patent infringement, and validity claims as there is a real and substantial connection to the UK, including MediaTek's UK presence and alleged acts. The Chinese proceedings do not resolve the global or UK-specific issues, and there is a real prospect of success on the merits. The anti-trust claim as pleaded is not sustainable and is struck out. Permission is granted to amend the pleadings and to rely on expert evidence of Chinese law. The applications to set aside service and stay the proceedings are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Jurisdiction applications and stay dismissed; anti-trust claim struck out; permission to amend and rely on expert evidence granted.
Orders
- Dismissal of Huawei's applications to set aside service and stay proceedings
- Strike out of MediaTek's anti-trust claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment