MediaTek Inc & Ors v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 649 (Pat) (18 March 2025)

MediaTek Inc & Ors v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd & Anor [2025] EWHC 649 (Pat) (18 March 2025)

The English court has jurisdiction to try the FRAND, patent infringement, and validity claims as there is a real and substantial connection to the UK, including MediaTek's UK presence and alleged acts. The Chinese proceedings do not resolve the global or UK-specific issues, and there is a real prospect of success on the merits. The anti-trust claim as pleaded is not sustainable and is struck out. Permission is granted to amend the pleadings and to rely on expert evidence of Chinese law. The applications to set aside service and stay the proceedings are dismissed.

Citation
[2025] EWHC 649 (Pat)
Parties
Claimant: MediaTek, Inc; Claimant: HFI Innovation, Inc; Claimant: MTK Wireless Limited; Defendant: Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd; Defendant: Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 March 2025
Procedural Posture
Patent/frand/competition / Interlocutory Applications (jurisdiction, Strike Out, Amendment, Service, Expert Evidence)
Outcome
Jurisdiction applications and stay dismissed; anti-trust claim struck out; permission to amend and rely on expert evidence granted.
Legal Topics
Standard Essential Patents (seps), FRAND Licensing, Patent Infringement, Patent Validity, Jurisdiction, Abuse of Dominant Position, Anti Trust, Cross Licensing, Declaratory Relief, Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MediaTek, Inc

Claimant

HFI Innovation, Inc

Claimant

MTK Wireless Limited

Claimant

Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd

Defendant

Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Patent/frand/competition / Interlocutory Applications (jurisdiction, Strike Out, Amendment, Service, Expert Evidence)

  1. 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction to determine FRAND and patent claims between MediaTek and Huawei
  2. 2 Whether the claims should be struck out or stayed due to parallel Chinese proceedings
  3. 3 Whether MediaTek's claims for abuse of dominant position are sustainable

Ratio Decidendi

The English court has jurisdiction to try the FRAND, patent infringement, and validity claims as there is a real and substantial connection to the UK, including MediaTek's UK presence and alleged acts. The Chinese proceedings do not resolve the global or UK-specific issues, and there is a real prospect of success on the merits. The anti-trust claim as pleaded is not sustainable and is struck out. Permission is granted to amend the pleadings and to rely on expert evidence of Chinese law. The applications to set aside service and stay the proceedings are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Jurisdiction applications and stay dismissed; anti-trust claim struck out; permission to amend and rely on expert evidence granted.

Orders

  • Dismissal of Huawei's applications to set aside service and stay proceedings
  • Strike out of MediaTek's anti-trust claim