Eli Lilly & Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc [2008] EWHC 2511 (Pat) (17 October 2008)
Lilly, as the overall successful party, is entitled to its costs except for those attributable to the discrete bioinformatics issue on which it lost. A fair and proportionate result is achieved by awarding Lilly 60% of its costs of the action as a whole.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 2511 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY; Defendant: HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Revocation Action / Post Judgment Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Claimant awarded 60% of its costs of the action as a whole.
- Legal Topics
- Patent Validity, Costs, Industrial Applicability, Obviousness, Insufficiency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Claimant
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Revocation Action / Post Judgment Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate order for costs following partial success in a patent revocation action
- 2 Whether costs should be apportioned based on issues won and lost, specifically the bioinformatics issue
Ratio Decidendi
Lilly, as the overall successful party, is entitled to its costs except for those attributable to the discrete bioinformatics issue on which it lost. A fair and proportionate result is achieved by awarding Lilly 60% of its costs of the action as a whole.
Court Disposition
Claimant awarded 60% of its costs of the action as a whole.
Orders
- Lilly is entitled to 60% of its costs of the action as a whole.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment