Horvath v Hungary
Hungary's assurances regarding detention conditions dispel doubts about Article 3 risk; extradition does not disproportionately interfere with Article 8 rights given the seriousness of charges and public interest.
- Parties
- Claimant: Andras Horvath; Defendant: Hungary
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Appeal From District Judge's Extradition Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; extradition order upheld.
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Prison Conditions, Family Life, Assurances in Extradition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andras Horvath
Claimant
Hungary
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Appeal From District Judge's Extradition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extradition to Hungary would breach Article 3 ECHR due to prison conditions
- 2 Whether extradition would disproportionately interfere with Article 8 ECHR rights to family life
Ratio Decidendi
Hungary's assurances regarding detention conditions dispel doubts about Article 3 risk; extradition does not disproportionately interfere with Article 8 rights given the seriousness of charges and public interest.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; extradition order upheld.
Orders
- Extradition of Andras Horvath to Hungary pursuant to European Arrest Warrant
- Legal aid assessment in usual form
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment