Hussein & Anor v Gibson & Anor

Hussein & Anor v Gibson & Anor

The court found no evidence of bias or unfairness by the trial judge. The judge's conduct was fair, courteous, and balanced between two litigants in person. The allegations of bias were wholly without merit and unsupported by the transcript or facts.

Parties
Appellant: Hussein; Respondent: Gibson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Bias, Fair Trial, Permission to Appeal
Civil Procedure Bias Fair Trial Permission to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hussein

Appellant

Gibson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge was biased against the appellant
  2. 2 Whether the appellant was denied a fair trial

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no evidence of bias or unfairness by the trial judge. The judge's conduct was fair, courteous, and balanced between two litigants in person. The allegations of bias were wholly without merit and unsupported by the transcript or facts.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application for permission to appeal is refused.