Mul v Hutton Construction Ltd [2014] EWHC 1797 (TCC) (05 June 2014)
An 'appropriate deduction' under Clause 2.30 of the JCT Intermediate Form of Contract (2005) means a deduction that is reasonable in all the circumstances and may be calculated by reference to contract rates, the cost to the contractor of remedying the defect, the reasonable cost to the employer of engaging another contractor, or other relevant factual circumstances. The clause does not exclude or limit the employer's right to damages for defects unless clear words are used.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1797 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Oksana Mul; Defendant: Hutton Construction Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Issues in Construction Contract Dispute / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of JCT Contract Terms, Defects Liability and Rectification Period, Appropriate Deduction Under Building Contract, Damages for Defective Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Oksana Mul
Claimant
Hutton Construction Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Issues in Construction Contract Dispute / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the correct basis for calculating an 'appropriate deduction' under Clause 2.30 of the JCT Intermediate Form of Contract (2005) when defects are not remedied by the contractor?
- 2 Does Clause 2.30 exclude or limit the employer's right to damages for defects?
- 3 Is the deduction limited to contract rates or can it be based on other measures such as cost to the employer or contractor?
Ratio Decidendi
An 'appropriate deduction' under Clause 2.30 of the JCT Intermediate Form of Contract (2005) means a deduction that is reasonable in all the circumstances and may be calculated by reference to contract rates, the cost to the contractor of remedying the defect, the reasonable cost to the employer of engaging another contractor, or other relevant factual circumstances. The clause does not exclude or limit the employer's right to damages for defects unless clear words are used.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant.
Orders
- 'Appropriate deduction' under Clause 2.30 is to be assessed reasonably in all the circumstances, not limited to contract rates.
- Costs of the preliminary issues hearing to be Claimant's costs in the case on a standard basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment