Motorola v Hytera

Motorola v Hytera

The court determined that the costs claimed were excessive and not justified by the complexity of the amendment, awarding a reduced figure of £5,000.

Parties
Claimant: Motorola; Respondent: Hytera
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Costs Determination Following Amendment to Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Costs awarded to claimant in reduced amount.
Legal Topics
Costs, Summary Judgment, Case Management
Civil Procedure Costs Summary Judgment Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Motorola

Claimant

Hytera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial / Costs Determination Following Amendment to Summary Judgment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate costs arising from amendment to summary judgment application

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the costs claimed were excessive and not justified by the complexity of the amendment, awarding a reduced figure of £5,000.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to claimant in reduced amount.

Orders

  • Claimant awarded £5,000 for costs arising from amendment to summary judgment application.