IA & Ors, R. v
The court found no impropriety or unfairness in the intermediary's conduct, held RB was a competent witness, determined the judge's handling of the racist juror was sufficient to ensure impartiality, found no basis to exclude ABE interviews, ruled severance for FA was unnecessary due to adequate judicial directions, and held there was sufficient evidence for all counts. All grounds of appeal failed.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: IA; Applicant: TA; Applicant: FA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trafficking for Exploitation, Benefit Fraud, Witness Competence, Jury Impartiality, Admissibility of Evidence, Role of Intermediaries, Bad Character Evidence, Severance of Trials
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
IA
Applicant
TA
Applicant
FA
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the intermediary's conduct compromised trial fairness
- 2 Whether the complainant RB was a competent witness
- 3 Whether the judge erred in refusing to discharge the jury after racist remarks
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no impropriety or unfairness in the intermediary's conduct, held RB was a competent witness, determined the judge's handling of the racist juror was sufficient to ensure impartiality, found no basis to exclude ABE interviews, ruled severance for FA was unnecessary due to adequate judicial directions, and held there was sufficient evidence for all counts. All grounds of appeal failed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment