Crystal Palace FC (2000) Ltd v Dowie
Mr Dowie made false representations to Mr Jordan regarding his contact and intentions with Charlton, intending to induce the Club to sign the Compromise Agreement, which the Club relied upon. However, rescission is not available as practical justice cannot be achieved and counter restitution is impossible due to...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Crystal Palace FC (2000) Limited; Defendant: Iain Dowie
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Claim for fraudulent misrepresentation succeeds; rescission denied.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Rescission, Deceit, Employment Contract, Compensation Clause
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crystal Palace FC (2000) Limited
Claimant
Iain Dowie
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Compromise Agreement was entered into on the basis of fraudulent representations by Mr Dowie
- 2 Whether the Compromise Agreement should be rescinded
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Dowie made false representations to Mr Jordan regarding his contact and intentions with Charlton, intending to induce the Club to sign the Compromise Agreement, which the Club relied upon. However, rescission is not available as practical justice cannot be achieved and counter restitution is impossible due to third party rights and inability to restore parties to original positions.
Court Disposition
Claim for fraudulent misrepresentation succeeds; rescission denied.
Orders
- Financial remedies to be determined; Compromise Agreement not rescinded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment