Kunicki & Anor v Hayward
The 2013 Will is valid. Mr. Hayward had testamentary capacity, knew and approved the contents of the Will, and there was no fraudulent calumny or undue influence. The alleged agreement between Fiona and Iain to share the inheritance equally was too vague and lacked intention to create legal relations, and is not enforceable.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jan Kunicki; Claimant: Fiona Kunicki; Defendant: Iain Hayward
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Probate / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Probate of the 2013 Will granted; counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Capacity, Knowledge and Approval, Fraudulent Calumny, Undue Influence, Family Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jan Kunicki
Claimant
Fiona Kunicki
Claimant
Iain Hayward
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2013 Will of Jack Hayward is valid and should be admitted to probate
- 2 Whether Mr. Hayward had testamentary capacity when making the 2013 Will
- 3 Whether Mr. Hayward knew and approved the contents of the 2013 Will
Ratio Decidendi
The 2013 Will is valid. Mr. Hayward had testamentary capacity, knew and approved the contents of the Will, and there was no fraudulent calumny or undue influence. The alleged agreement between Fiona and Iain to share the inheritance equally was too vague and lacked intention to create legal relations, and is not enforceable.
Court Disposition
Probate of the 2013 Will granted; counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Probate of the 2013 Will of Jack Hayward is decreed in solemn form.
- The Amended Counterclaim by Iain Hayward is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment