Ian Driver v Information Commissioner
The application for permission to appeal is refused because the grounds do not disclose any arguable error of law; the Tribunal fully considered the facts and arguments, provided adequate reasons, and was not required to address every piece of evidence or reargue factual matters.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ian Driver; Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal / Refusal of Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Information Regulations, Error of Law, Adequacy of Reasons, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Driver
Appellant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal / Refusal of Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law in refusing the appeal against the Information Commissioner's decision
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to give adequate reasons or consider material evidence
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's findings were irrational or perverse
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal is refused because the grounds do not disclose any arguable error of law; the Tribunal fully considered the facts and arguments, provided adequate reasons, and was not required to address every piece of evidence or reargue factual matters.
Court Disposition
application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal is refused.
- The Appellant may renew his application to the Upper Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment