Ian Driver v The Information Commissioner
Regulation 12(4)(d) was not engaged for information on money actually spent as at the request date, so that information must be disclosed; regulation 12(4)(d) was engaged for information on future liabilities, and the public interest test favoured withholding that incomplete information. The Council breached...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Ian Driver; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Environmental Information Regulations, Public Interest Test, Regulation 12(4)(d), Regulation 14(2), Regulation 11(4), Freedom of Information
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Driver
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIRs) applied to the request
- 2 Whether regulation 12(4)(d) exception was engaged for the requested information
- 3 Whether the public interest test favoured disclosure or withholding
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 12(4)(d) was not engaged for information on money actually spent as at the request date, so that information must be disclosed; regulation 12(4)(d) was engaged for information on future liabilities, and the public interest test favoured withholding that incomplete information. The Council breached regulation 14(2) and regulation 11(4) by failing to respond within statutory timeframes.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Council must disclose all information held within scope of Part 1 of the request
- Council may withhold information within scope of Part 2 of the request under regulation 12(4)(d)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment