Deansgate 123 LLP v Workman & Anor
Neither Mrs. Forrester nor Deansgate abused the process of the court by bringing section 423 applications separately from the validity challenge to the Transfer Form, as their intentions were made clear, the court directed separate determination, and no unjust harassment or oppression occurred.
- Parties
- Claimant: Deansgate 123 LLP; Defendant: Ian Garth Workman; Defendant: Ian Grant Workman; Claimant: Carol Ann Forrester (as Executrix of the estate of Susan Margaret Workman)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Applications to Strike Out Claims for Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Applications to strike out the Forrester and Deansgate section 423 claims for abuse of process are dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Section 423 Insolvency Act, Res Judicata, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deansgate 123 LLP
Claimant
Ian Garth Workman
Defendant
Ian Grant Workman
Defendant
Carol Ann Forrester (as Executrix of the estate of Susan Margaret Workman)
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Applications to Strike Out Claims for Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Forrester and Deansgate section 423 claims should be struck out as an abuse of process for not being brought together with the validity challenge to the Transfer Form
Ratio Decidendi
Neither Mrs. Forrester nor Deansgate abused the process of the court by bringing section 423 applications separately from the validity challenge to the Transfer Form, as their intentions were made clear, the court directed separate determination, and no unjust harassment or oppression occurred.
Court Disposition
Applications to strike out the Forrester and Deansgate section 423 claims for abuse of process are dismissed.
Orders
- The Forrester Claim is not struck out as an abuse of process.
- The Deansgate Claim is not struck out as an abuse of process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment