Sudicka v Morgan & Ors
Ms Sudicka was beneficially entitled to 50% of AGLK. Mr Morgan breached the shareholders' agreement and his director duties by excluding her, misappropriating company funds, and orchestrating the transfer of business and assets to himself, assisted by Mr Garton, Mr Crocker, and Mr Cotton. Their conduct amounted to unfair prejudice under s994 Companies Act 2006. The appropriate remedy is a buyout of Ms Sudicka's 50% shareholding at a value of £202,500 as at March 2015, with joint and several liability apportioned as specified.
- Parties
- Claimant/petitioner: Romana Sudicka; Defendant/respondent: Steven Charles Morgan; Defendant/respondent: AGL Accountants Ltd; Defendant/respondent: David John Cotton; Respondent: Ian Glen Garton; Respondent: Charles Steven Crocker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (company Law, Unfair Prejudice Petition, Contract) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition and claim allowed; judgment for Ms Sudicka.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Disputes, Director Duties, Quasi Partnership, Breach of Shareholders' Agreement, Valuation of Shares, Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Romana Sudicka
Claimant/petitioner
Steven Charles Morgan
Defendant/respondent
AGL Accountants Ltd
Defendant/respondent
David John Cotton
Defendant/respondent
Ian Glen Garton
Respondent
Charles Steven Crocker
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (company Law, Unfair Prejudice Petition, Contract) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms Sudicka was entitled to 50% of the shares in AGL Accountants Ltd (AGLK)
- 2 Whether Mr Morgan breached the shareholders' agreement and director duties
- 3 Whether Mr Cotton's shares were validly bought back and/or transferred
Ratio Decidendi
Ms Sudicka was beneficially entitled to 50% of AGLK. Mr Morgan breached the shareholders' agreement and his director duties by excluding her, misappropriating company funds, and orchestrating the transfer of business and assets to himself, assisted by Mr Garton, Mr Crocker, and Mr Cotton. Their conduct amounted to unfair prejudice under s994 Companies Act 2006. The appropriate remedy is a buyout of Ms Sudicka's 50% shareholding at a value of £202,500 as at March 2015, with joint and several liability apportioned as specified.
Court Disposition
Petition and claim allowed; judgment for Ms Sudicka.
Orders
- Mr Morgan to pay Ms Sudicka £202,500 for her 50% beneficial interest in AGLK.
- Mr Garton and Mr Crocker jointly and severally liable with Mr Morgan for the full sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment