R v Ian Hewitt
The sentence was not manifestly excessive. The judge made an appropriate downward adjustment for the fact that the offence in Count 13 did not take place and the children were fictitious. The structure of consecutive and concurrent sentences properly reflected the totality of the offending, and the overall sentence was just and proportionate given the seriousness and persistence of the offences.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Ian Hewitt
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Indecent Images of Children, Attempted Sexual Communication With a Child, Distribution of Indecent Images, Encouraging or Assisting Crime
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Ian Hewitt
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the judge failed to apply sufficient reduction for the fact that no actual offence took place in Count 13
- 3 Whether the principle of totality was properly applied in structuring consecutive sentences
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was not manifestly excessive. The judge made an appropriate downward adjustment for the fact that the offence in Count 13 did not take place and the children were fictitious. The structure of consecutive and concurrent sentences properly reflected the totality of the offending, and the overall sentence was just and proportionate given the seriousness and persistence of the offences.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment