O'Connell v Rollings & Ors (Administrators of Musion Systems Ltd) [2014] EWCA Civ 806 (21 May 2014)
The court found a clear breach of the confidentiality embargo, but accepted the breaches were inadvertent and, in light of apologies, ordered indemnity costs in favour of the appellant for appearances and work occasioned by the breaches.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 806
- Parties
- Appellant: Ian O'Connell; Respondent: Michael David Rollings; Respondent: Vivienne Elizabeth Oliver; Respondent: Chris Laughton; Respondent: Peter Godfrey-Evans
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Breach of Confidentiality Embargo
- Outcome
- Costs order in favour of appellant on indemnity basis
- Legal Topics
- Confidentiality Embargo, Breach of Court Order, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian O'Connell
Appellant
Michael David Rollings
Respondent
Vivienne Elizabeth Oliver
Respondent
Chris Laughton
Respondent
Peter Godfrey-Evans
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Breach of Confidentiality Embargo
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a breach of the confidentiality embargo on a draft judgment
- 2 Consequences of breach of confidentiality embargo
Ratio Decidendi
The court found a clear breach of the confidentiality embargo, but accepted the breaches were inadvertent and, in light of apologies, ordered indemnity costs in favour of the appellant for appearances and work occasioned by the breaches.
Court Disposition
Costs order in favour of appellant on indemnity basis
Orders
- Appellant to have costs of appearances necessitated by the breaches and costs occasioned by the breaches, on an indemnity basis
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment