Khan, R. v [2022] EWCA Crim 1487 (25 October 2022)
The trial judge's summing up was sufficiently balanced and fair, adequately presenting the defence case to the jury. The sentence of 16 years' minimum term was proportionate, properly reflecting the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating factors, and the applicant's age. There was no arguable ground for appeal against conviction or sentence.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Crim 1487
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ibrahim Khan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Self Defence, Sentencing of Children and Young People, Judicial Summing Up, Knife Crime
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ibrahim Khan
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's summing up of the defence case was sufficiently balanced and fair
- 2 Whether the minimum term of 16 years imposed for murder was manifestly excessive given the applicant's age and circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's summing up was sufficiently balanced and fair, adequately presenting the defence case to the jury. The sentence of 16 years' minimum term was proportionate, properly reflecting the seriousness of the offence, the aggravating factors, and the applicant's age. There was no arguable ground for appeal against conviction or sentence.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment