R v Ibrahim Khan
The trial judge's summing up was sufficiently balanced and fair, adequately summarising the defence case in accordance with legal principles. The sentence imposed was proportionate, with appropriate consideration of the applicant's age and the aggravating and mitigating factors. There was no arguable ground undermining the safety of the conviction or justifying a reduction in sentence.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ibrahim Khan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Possession of Bladed Article, Self Defence, Sentencing of Young Offenders, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ibrahim Khan
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's summing up of the defence case was balanced and comprehensive
- 2 Whether the minimum term imposed for murder was manifestly excessive given the applicant's age and circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's summing up was sufficiently balanced and fair, adequately summarising the defence case in accordance with legal principles. The sentence imposed was proportionate, with appropriate consideration of the applicant's age and the aggravating and mitigating factors. There was no arguable ground undermining the safety of the conviction or justifying a reduction in sentence.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal conviction and sentence refused
Orders
- application for permission to appeal against conviction refused
- application for permission to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment