R v ICG
The sentences imposed, including nine years for attempted rape and six years for sexual activity with a child, were not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and severe consequences for the complainant. The judge properly applied the totality principle, and the overall sentence of 16 years' imprisonment was justified and proportionate to the gravity of the offending.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: ICG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Totality Principle, Abuse of Trust, Child Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
ICG
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for attempted rape (count 7) was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed for sexual activity with a child (count 2) was manifestly excessive
- 3 Whether the overall sentence of 16 years' imprisonment failed to adequately reflect the totality principle
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed, including nine years for attempted rape and six years for sexual activity with a child, were not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors and severe consequences for the complainant. The judge properly applied the totality principle, and the overall sentence of 16 years' imprisonment was justified and proportionate to the gravity of the offending.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
- The sentence of 16 years' imprisonment stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment