TRK & Anor v ICM
The likelihood that the claimants would obtain injunctions at trial restraining the defendant from harassment and disclosure of wrongfully acquired private information was sufficient to justify short-term ex parte injunctions pending a hearing on notice.
- Parties
- Claimant: TRK; Claimant: BVP; Defendant: ICM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction Application / Interim Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim injunctions granted for 7 days pending a hearing on notice to the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Misuse of Private Information, Harassment, Interim Injunctions, Unauthorised Access, Balancing Article 8 and Article 10 Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TRK
Claimant
BVP
Claimant
ICM
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Interim Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application should be heard without notice to the defendant
- 2 Whether there is a real risk of continued harassment or disclosure by the defendant
- 3 Whether the claimants are likely to obtain injunctions at trial restraining the defendant's conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The likelihood that the claimants would obtain injunctions at trial restraining the defendant from harassment and disclosure of wrongfully acquired private information was sufficient to justify short-term ex parte injunctions pending a hearing on notice.
Court Disposition
Interim injunctions granted for 7 days pending a hearing on notice to the defendant.
Orders
- Defendant restrained from engaging in harassment of claimants.
- Defendant restrained from making disclosures representing misuse of claimants' private information.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment