Ieuan Joyce (RM & CF Joyce) v The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Neutral citation number: [2025] UKFTT 01075 (GRC) First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Nitrate Vulnerable Zones Case Reference: FT/NVZ/2025/0026 Decided without a hearing Decision given on: 11 Sept 2025 Before JUDGE SAWARD Between IEUAN JOYCE (RM & CF JOYCE) and Appellant THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS Respondent Decision: The appeal is allowed. The part of the relevant holding in respect of which the appeal is upheld are two fields relating to NVZ ID number: G4 as identified in the appeal submitted on 7 June 2025. REASONS 1. Regulation 4(2) of the Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations 2015 (“the Regulations”) requires the Secretary of State to monitor the nitrate concentration in freshwaters over a prescribed period. The nitrate must be measured in order to identify water that is affected by pollution (or could be if the controls provided by the Regulations are not applied), and then to identify land which drains into those waters and that contributes to its pollution. If necessary, such land may then be designated as a “nitrate vulnerable zone” (“NVZ”). 2. On 12 May 2025 the Secretary of State sent written notice to the Appellant under regulation 5(3)(b) of the Regulations that one or more of their relevant holdings falls wholly or partly within an area that the Secretary of State has identified as an NVZ. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 3. The Regulations define “a relevant holding” as land and any associated buildings used for growing crops in soil, or rearing livestock for agricultural purposes, that fall wholly or partly in an NVZ. 4. The Appellant has appealed against the notice under regulation 6(2)(a) of the Regulations on the grounds that two fields have been included within the NVZ that do not drain into water which the Secretary of State has identified as polluted. This is known as a “Type A” appeal. The Appellant stated that previous appeals had been made and upheld each time against the inclusion of the fields within the NVZ. 5. The Environment Agency has responded to the appeal on behalf of the Secretary of State. It confirms that the appeal is not opposed because the two fields identified by the Appellant do not drain to a polluted water. The evidence supplied by the Appellant had previously been reviewed by the Environment Agency and it was agreed that the land identified should be removed from the NVZ. 6. The Environment Agency considers that the designations made by the Secretary of State should be amended to remove the land identified by the Appellant in this appeal from “NVZ ID number: G4”. Given this concession, the appeal is allowed. 7. Pursuant to regulation 6(3) of the Regulations, where the Tribunal upholds an appeal on a Type A appeal the Secretary of State must treat the relevant part of the holding in respect of which the appeal is upheld as not draining into the water concerned. Signed: Judge Saward Date: 12 August 2025 2