IG Index Ltd v Ehrentreu

IG Index Ltd v Ehrentreu

The Settlement Agreement excluded the right of set-off but did not extinguish the respondent’s cross-claim for damages. IG Index is entitled to judgment for the sum claimed, but Mr Ehrentreu may pursue his counterclaim as a separate action.

Parties
Appellant: IG Index Limited; Respondent: Aryeh Ehrentreu
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Summary Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Set Off, Breach of Contract, Breach of Statutory Duty, Interpretation of Settlement Agreements
Contract Law Financial Regulation Summary Judgment Set Off Breach of Contract Breach of Statutory Duty Interpretation of Settlement Agreements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

IG Index Limited

Appellant

Aryeh Ehrentreu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal From Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent had a real prospect of success in a claim for breach of contract or statutory duty for failure to close out bets
  2. 2 Whether such claims were extinguished by the Settlement Agreement
  3. 3 Whether the counterclaim could operate as a set-off against the appellant's claim

Ratio Decidendi

The Settlement Agreement excluded the right of set-off but did not extinguish the respondent’s cross-claim for damages. IG Index is entitled to judgment for the sum claimed, but Mr Ehrentreu may pursue his counterclaim as a separate action.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • IG Index is entitled to the judgment sum for which summary judgment was given.
  • Mr Ehrentreu is free to pursue his counterclaim as a separate action.