Ashaoui v R. [2023] EWCA Crim 455 (27 April 2023)

Ashaoui v R. [2023] EWCA Crim 455 (27 April 2023)

The second trial was not a retrial of the first, as it concerned a broader conspiracy, more defendants, and additional evidence. Therefore, the third trial was not a second retrial and was not an abuse of process. The interests of justice were best served by allowing the third trial to proceed.

Citation
[2023] EWCA Crim 455
Parties
Appellant: Ihab Ashaoui; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Retrial, Conspiracy to Rob, Handling Stolen Goods, Money Laundering
Criminal Law Abuse of Process Retrial Conspiracy to Rob Handling Stolen Goods Money Laundering

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ihab Ashaoui

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the third trial constituted a second retrial and thus an abuse of process
  2. 2 Whether the second trial was a retrial of the first trial on the same key issues

Ratio Decidendi

The second trial was not a retrial of the first, as it concerned a broader conspiracy, more defendants, and additional evidence. Therefore, the third trial was not a second retrial and was not an abuse of process. The interests of justice were best served by allowing the third trial to proceed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction upheld
  • No stay of proceedings as abuse of process