The Parliamentary By-election of Gorton and Denton, In the Matter Of [2026] EWHC 565 (KB) (25 February 2026)
Relief is granted because the omission of the statutory imprint was inadvertent, arose from a production error outside the claimants' control, all reasonable steps were taken to comply, there was no want of good faith, and appropriate notice was given with no objections raised.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 565 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Matthew Goodwin; Claimant: Adam Rawlinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Relief Under Representation of the People Act 1983 / Judgment on Application for Relief Prior to by Election
- Outcome
- Relief granted under section 167 of the Representation of the People Act 1983; claimants not subject to consequences of illegal practice.
- Legal Topics
- Illegal Practice, Statutory Imprint, Election Material, Relief From Consequences, Representation of the People Act 1983
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matthew Goodwin
Claimant
Adam Rawlinson
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Application for Relief Under Representation of the People Act 1983 / Judgment on Application for Relief Prior to by Election
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether omission of statutory imprint on election leaflets constitutes an illegal practice under section 110(12) of the Representation of the People Act 1983
- 2 Whether relief should be granted under section 167 of the Act for an illegal practice arising from inadvertence
Ratio Decidendi
Relief is granted because the omission of the statutory imprint was inadvertent, arose from a production error outside the claimants' control, all reasonable steps were taken to comply, there was no want of good faith, and appropriate notice was given with no objections raised.
Court Disposition
Relief granted under section 167 of the Representation of the People Act 1983; claimants not subject to consequences of illegal practice.
Orders
- The act or omission is excepted from the provisions making it an illegal practice; no person shall be subject to any consequences under the Act for this omission.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment