IM v Gateshead Council & Anor [2020] EWFC B85 (03 July 2020)
IM has not acquired habitual residence in England and Wales as the necessary degree of stability, permanence, and integration has not been established; IM remains habitually resident in Scotland.
- Citation
- [2020] EWFC B85
- Parties
- Applicant: IM; First Respondent: Gateshead Council; Second Respondent: City of Edinburgh Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Section 21 a Application Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 / Determination of Habitual Residence and Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- IM's habitual residence remains in Scotland; court does not have jurisdiction under section 21A Mental Capacity Act 2005 as of today.
- Legal Topics
- Habitual Residence, Jurisdiction, Deprivation of Liberty, Section 21 a Mental Capacity Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
IM
Applicant
Gateshead Council
First Respondent
City of Edinburgh Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 21 a Application Under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 / Determination of Habitual Residence and Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Has IM acquired habitual residence in England and Wales?
- 2 Does the court have jurisdiction under section 21A Mental Capacity Act 2005?
Ratio Decidendi
IM has not acquired habitual residence in England and Wales as the necessary degree of stability, permanence, and integration has not been established; IM remains habitually resident in Scotland.
Court Disposition
IM's habitual residence remains in Scotland; court does not have jurisdiction under section 21A Mental Capacity Act 2005 as of today.
Orders
- No change in habitual residence; application under section 21A remains extant pending further assessment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment