Gopalakrishnan, R (on the application of) v Immigration Adjudicator & Anor

Gopalakrishnan, R (on the application of) v Immigration Adjudicator & Anor

The adjudicator was entitled to agree with the Secretary of State's certification that the claim was manifestly unfounded and that there was no reasonable likelihood the claimant had been tortured, based on adverse credibility findings and the evidence before him. The certification was valid and the challenge to it must fail.

Parties
Claimant: Gopalakrishnan; Defendant: Immigration Adjudicator; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 January 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum, Certification of Manifestly Unfounded Claims, Judicial Review of Certification, Credibility Assessment, Torture Definition Under Asylum Law
Immigration Law Administrative Law Asylum Certification of Manifestly Unfounded Claims Judicial Review of Certification Credibility Assessment Torture Definition Under Asylum Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gopalakrishnan

Claimant

Immigration Adjudicator

Defendant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Secretary of State's certification under paragraph 9(4)(b) and 9(7) of Schedule 4 to the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 was valid
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator's agreement with the certification was lawful
  3. 3 Whether the claimant's evidence established a reasonable likelihood of torture

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator was entitled to agree with the Secretary of State's certification that the claim was manifestly unfounded and that there was no reasonable likelihood the claimant had been tortured, based on adverse credibility findings and the evidence before him. The certification was valid and the challenge to it must fail.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed