Gopalakrishnan, R (on the application of) v Immigration Adjudicator & Anor [2003] EWHC 6 (Admin) (20 January 2003)
The adjudicator was reasonably entitled to conclude, based on adverse credibility findings and lack of evidence, that the claim was manifestly unfounded and that there was no reasonable likelihood the claimant had been tortured. The certification was valid and properly upheld.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 6 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Gopalakrishnan; Defendant: Immigration Adjudicator; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Asylum Certification, Manifestly Unfounded Claims, Torture Evidence, Appeal Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gopalakrishnan
Claimant
Immigration Adjudicator
Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State's certification under paragraph 9 of schedule 4 to the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 was valid
- 2 Whether the adjudicator was correct to uphold the certification
- 3 Whether evidence relating to torture was properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator was reasonably entitled to conclude, based on adverse credibility findings and lack of evidence, that the claim was manifestly unfounded and that there was no reasonable likelihood the claimant had been tortured. The certification was valid and properly upheld.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment