Gopalakrishnan, R (on the application of) v Immigration Adjudicator & Anor [2003] EWHC 6 (Admin) (20 January 2003)

Gopalakrishnan, R (on the application of) v Immigration Adjudicator & Anor [2003] EWHC 6 (Admin) (20 January 2003)

The adjudicator was reasonably entitled to conclude, based on adverse credibility findings and lack of evidence, that the claim was manifestly unfounded and that there was no reasonable likelihood the claimant had been tortured. The certification was valid and properly upheld.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 6 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Gopalakrishnan; Defendant: Immigration Adjudicator; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 January 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Asylum Certification, Manifestly Unfounded Claims, Torture Evidence, Appeal Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gopalakrishnan

Claimant

Immigration Adjudicator

Defendant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Secretary of State's certification under paragraph 9 of schedule 4 to the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 was valid
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator was correct to uphold the certification
  3. 3 Whether evidence relating to torture was properly considered

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator was reasonably entitled to conclude, based on adverse credibility findings and lack of evidence, that the claim was manifestly unfounded and that there was no reasonable likelihood the claimant had been tortured. The certification was valid and properly upheld.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed