Nine Nepalese Asylum Seekers, R (On the Application Of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
The applications for judicial review were totally devoid of merit, raised no viable legal grounds, and constituted an abuse of the process of the court. Judicial review is not a mechanism to challenge findings of fact by the Adjudicator, and the Court of Appeal will strike out such applications under its inherent and procedural powers.
- Parties
- Claimants/appellants: Nine Nepalese Asylum Seekers; Respondent: Immigration Appeal Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review/appeal / Appeal From Administrative Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- All appeals dismissed as totally devoid of merit and an abuse of process.
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Judicial Review, Abuse of Process, Appellate Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nine Nepalese Asylum Seekers
Claimants/appellants
Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review/appeal / Appeal From Administrative Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applications for judicial review by the asylum seekers raise any viable legal grounds
- 2 Whether the repeated applications constitute an abuse of the court's process
- 3 Whether the Court of Appeal should strike out applications that are totally devoid of merit
Ratio Decidendi
The applications for judicial review were totally devoid of merit, raised no viable legal grounds, and constituted an abuse of the process of the court. Judicial review is not a mechanism to challenge findings of fact by the Adjudicator, and the Court of Appeal will strike out such applications under its inherent and procedural powers.
Court Disposition
All appeals dismissed as totally devoid of merit and an abuse of process.
Orders
- All nine applications for permission to appeal are dismissed.
- Direction given to court staff to bring similar cases to the judge's attention for possible striking out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment