Ucar, R (on the application of) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal & Anor
The Tribunal erred in not considering Mr McDowall's report, as it was capable of undermining the adjudicator's reasons for doubting the claimant's credibility. The Tribunal was required to consider the report in determining the application for leave to appeal.
- Parties
- Claimant: UCAR; Defendant: Immigration Appeal Tribunal; Interested Party: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Renewed Application for Permission for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Application allowed; Tribunal's decision quashed; matter remitted for reconsideration
- Legal Topics
- Asylum, Judicial Review, Fresh Evidence, Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UCAR
Claimant
Immigration Appeal Tribunal
Defendant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Renewed Application for Permission for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in refusing to consider fresh evidence (Mr McDowall's report) when deciding leave to appeal
- 2 Interpretation and application of rule 18(11) of the Immigration and Asylum Appeals (Procedure) Rules 2000
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in not considering Mr McDowall's report, as it was capable of undermining the adjudicator's reasons for doubting the claimant's credibility. The Tribunal was required to consider the report in determining the application for leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; Tribunal's decision quashed; matter remitted for reconsideration
Orders
- Order quashing the Tribunal's refusal of leave to appeal
- Order requiring a different Tribunal member to reconsider leave to appeal in light of Mr McDowall's report
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment