OISC v Javed Chaudry t/a Springwood Legal Services Ltd

OISC v Javed Chaudry t/a Springwood Legal Services Ltd

The Tribunal found, on a balance of probabilities, that Chaudry provided immigration advice and services above his registered competence level, breached Codes 6, 9, and 13 (a) and (d), and fabricated evidence to mislead the Commissioner, rendering him unfit to provide immigration advice or services.

Parties
Appellant: Immigration Services Commissioner; Respondent: Javed Chaudry
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 August 2010
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Charge / Final Determination
Outcome
disciplinary charge upheld
Legal Topics
Unauthorised Practice, Professional Misconduct, Disciplinary Proceedings
Immigration Law Regulatory Law Unauthorised Practice Professional Misconduct Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Immigration Services Commissioner

Appellant

Javed Chaudry

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Disciplinary Charge / Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Did Javed Chaudry provide immigration advice or services above his registered competence level?
  2. 2 Did Javed Chaudry breach Codes 6, 9, and 13 (a) and (d) of the Commissioner’s Code of Standards?
  3. 3 Did Javed Chaudry attempt to mislead the Commissioner by fabricating evidence?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found, on a balance of probabilities, that Chaudry provided immigration advice and services above his registered competence level, breached Codes 6, 9, and 13 (a) and (d), and fabricated evidence to mislead the Commissioner, rendering him unfit to provide immigration advice or services.

Court Disposition

disciplinary charge upheld

Orders

  • Javed Chaudry is prohibited from providing immigration advice or immigration services indefinitely under Section 89(8)(c) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999.