Malik, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1098 (31 August 2023)
The sentencing judge failed to provide adequate reasoning for more than doubling the guideline starting point, resulting in an unwarranted uplift. The correct sentence after trial should have been 20 months, reduced to 17 months for the guilty plea. The original sentence was quashed and substituted with a 17-month...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1098
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Appellant: Imran Malik
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Careless Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Imran Malik
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for causing death by careless driving was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge properly applied the Sentencing Council's guidelines
- 3 Whether aggravating and mitigating factors were correctly assessed
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge failed to provide adequate reasoning for more than doubling the guideline starting point, resulting in an unwarranted uplift. The correct sentence after trial should have been 20 months, reduced to 17 months for the guilty plea. The original sentence was quashed and substituted with a 17-month immediate custodial sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence of 27 months' imprisonment quashed and substituted with 17 months' imprisonment
- Disqualification from driving reduced to two years, extended by eight months to reflect incarceration (total 32 months)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment