Sabir, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 804 (16 June 2023)
The conviction was quashed because the trial judge failed to adequately direct the jury on the specific weaknesses in the identification evidence against the appellant, did not draw together and explain the cumulative impact of those weaknesses, and did not tailor the Turnbull direction to the facts of the case, rendering the conviction unsafe.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 804
- Parties
- Appellant: Imran Sabir; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Identification Evidence, Jury Directions, Unsafe Conviction, Sexual Offences (amendment) Act 1992
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Imran Sabir
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to adequately direct the jury on weaknesses in the identification evidence against the appellant
- 2 Whether the summing up was unbalanced and incomplete regarding the defence case on mistaken identification
- 3 Whether the conviction is unsafe due to inadequate legal directions
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was quashed because the trial judge failed to adequately direct the jury on the specific weaknesses in the identification evidence against the appellant, did not draw together and explain the cumulative impact of those weaknesses, and did not tailor the Turnbull direction to the facts of the case, rendering the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed
Orders
- The conviction of Imran Sabir is quashed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment