Ali v R
The applicant failed to displace statutory presumptions regarding the criminal provenance of assets and did not provide credible evidence to show his available assets were less than the benefit figure. There was no reasonable excuse for failing to adduce fresh evidence during the original proceedings, and the Recorder's findings on asset calculation and credibility were open to him on the evidence.
- Parties
- Applicant: Imtiaz Ali; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- Applications for leave to appeal and to admit fresh evidence refused; confiscation order upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, MTIC Fraud, Statutory Presumptions, Fresh Evidence, Asset Valuation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Imtiaz Ali
Applicant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the confiscation order under POCA was correctly made
- 2 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted
- 3 Whether statutory presumptions regarding criminal lifestyle were properly applied
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to displace statutory presumptions regarding the criminal provenance of assets and did not provide credible evidence to show his available assets were less than the benefit figure. There was no reasonable excuse for failing to adduce fresh evidence during the original proceedings, and the Recorder's findings on asset calculation and credibility were open to him on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Applications for leave to appeal and to admit fresh evidence refused; confiscation order upheld.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal refused
- Application to admit fresh evidence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment