Vertex Trading Sarl v Infinity Holdings Ltd

Vertex Trading Sarl v Infinity Holdings Ltd

The court declined to restrain advertisement of the petition because the company is not trading, is insolvent, and there is insufficient evidence of prejudice or reputational damage. The dispute as to the debt can be resolved in the liquidation process.

Parties
Petitioner: Vertex Trading SARL; Respondent: Infinity Holdings Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Petition / Interlocutory Application to Restrain Advertisement of Petition
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Winding Up Petition, Disputed Debt, Injunction to Restrain Advertisement, Insolvency Proceedings
Insolvency Company Law Winding Up Petition Disputed Debt Injunction to Restrain Advertisement Insolvency Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vertex Trading SARL

Petitioner

Infinity Holdings Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Winding Up Petition / Interlocutory Application to Restrain Advertisement of Petition

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should restrain advertisement of a winding up petition where the debt is disputed
  2. 2 Whether the company’s insolvency and non-trading status affect the grant of injunctive relief

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to restrain advertisement of the petition because the company is not trading, is insolvent, and there is insufficient evidence of prejudice or reputational damage. The dispute as to the debt can be resolved in the liquidation process.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Relief to restrain advertisement of the petition is declined