Environment Agency v Inglenorth Ltd
On the magistrates' findings of fact, the demolition material was not waste at the time of deposit at the Cheadle site because the owner had a clear, immediate intention to reuse it as hardcore for a car park, and it was not being discarded. The correct legal test was applied, and the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Environment Agency; Defendant: Inglenorth Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Divisional Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Waste, Environmental Protection Act 1990, European Waste Framework Directive, Controlled Waste, Licensing Requirements, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environment Agency
Claimant
Inglenorth Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Divisional Court Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether demolition material delivered for intended reuse constitutes 'waste' under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and the Waste Framework Directive
- 2 Whether the magistrates applied the correct legal test for 'discard' and 'waste'
- 3 Whether the findings of fact supported the acquittal
Ratio Decidendi
On the magistrates' findings of fact, the demolition material was not waste at the time of deposit at the Cheadle site because the owner had a clear, immediate intention to reuse it as hardcore for a car park, and it was not being discarded. The correct legal test was applied, and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal by Environment Agency dismissed
- No certification of point of law for appeal to House of Lords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment