Pelling v Head of Civil Appeals [2006] EWCA Civ 697 (09 May 2006)
The claimant had an alternative remedy available under CPR 52.16(5) to seek reconsideration by a Court of Appeal judge, and therefore judicial review was not available; the Administrative Court correctly declined jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 697
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Michael John Pelling; Defendant/respondent: Head of Civil Appeals
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review and Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Application for Reconsideration
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused; application for reconsideration allowed; permission to file application notice granted.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Anonymity Orders, Judicial Review, Alternative Remedies, Children Act 1989, Contempt of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael John Pelling
Claimant/appellant
Head of Civil Appeals
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review and Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Application for Reconsideration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Administrative Court had jurisdiction to review a decision of the Court of Appeal or its officers
- 2 Whether there was an alternative remedy available to the claimant
- 3 Whether the 1996 injunction should be discharged or set aside
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant had an alternative remedy available under CPR 52.16(5) to seek reconsideration by a Court of Appeal judge, and therefore judicial review was not available; the Administrative Court correctly declined jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused; application for reconsideration allowed; permission to file application notice granted.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal against Leveson J's judgment refused.
- Application for reconsideration of Deputy Master's order allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment