Innerspaces Self Storage Ltd v Harding & Ors

Innerspaces Self Storage Ltd v Harding & Ors

The landlord's obligation to administer and manage the estate under paragraph 6-3.12 did not impose a duty to remove the rubble heap or maintain the estate's appearance to an unspecified standard. The express obligations regarding retained and common parts were subject to the landlord acting reasonably. No breach of covenant or actionable misrepresentation was established, and no damages were proven.

Parties
Appellant: Innerspaces Self Storage Limited; Respondent: Peter Gerald Harding; Respondent: Brian Graham Harding; Respondent: Alan George Harding; Respondent: Place Road Properties Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Covenant, Lease Interpretation, Damages, Misrepresentation
Landlord and Tenant Contract Breach of Covenant Lease Interpretation Damages Misrepresentation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Innerspaces Self Storage Limited

Appellant

Peter Gerald Harding

Respondent

Brian Graham Harding

Respondent

Alan George Harding

Respondent

Place Road Properties Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the presence of a rubble heap constituted a breach of covenant to perform services under the lease
  2. 2 Whether the landlord failed to permit quiet enjoyment or derogated from grant
  3. 3 Whether there was actionable misrepresentation by the landlord

Ratio Decidendi

The landlord's obligation to administer and manage the estate under paragraph 6-3.12 did not impose a duty to remove the rubble heap or maintain the estate's appearance to an unspecified standard. The express obligations regarding retained and common parts were subject to the landlord acting reasonably. No breach of covenant or actionable misrepresentation was established, and no damages were proven.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed