Rothesay Assurance Ltd, Re
The scheme does not pose a material risk to the solvency of Rothesay Life or the security of transferring policyholders. Regulatory and internal capital requirements provide sufficient protection, and the scheme is equitable and within the range of reasonable and fair schemes. Policyholder objections do not establish real risks warranting refusal of approval.
- Parties
- Transferor: Rothesay Assurance Limited; Transferee: Rothesay Life Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Insurance Business Transfer Scheme / Judgment
- Outcome
- scheme approved
- Legal Topics
- Insurance Business Transfer, Capital Adequacy, Policyholder Protection, Solvency II, Regulatory Approval
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rothesay Assurance Limited
Transferor
Rothesay Life Limited
Transferee
Procedural Posture
Insurance Business Transfer Scheme / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed insurance business transfer scheme adversely affects the security and reasonable benefit expectations of policyholders
- 2 Whether the scheme meets regulatory requirements and is equitable to all classes of policyholders
Ratio Decidendi
The scheme does not pose a material risk to the solvency of Rothesay Life or the security of transferring policyholders. Regulatory and internal capital requirements provide sufficient protection, and the scheme is equitable and within the range of reasonable and fair schemes. Policyholder objections do not establish real risks warranting refusal of approval.
Court Disposition
scheme approved
Orders
- Court approves the insurance business transfer scheme under section 111 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
- Scheme to become effective at 11.59 pm on 30 November 2015, subject to tax clearances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment