Starbev GP Ltd v Interbrew Central European Holdings BV
The court ruled that the deemed Equity Return under the anti-avoidance provisions is calculated by reference to the actual amount withheld for breach of warranty claims, not the maximum possible exposure. For Excess Equity Return, only Equity Returns with respect to which an Excess Return Payment has already been made are excluded, based on factual occurrence. Contractual interest is not payable as the sums were disputed in good faith within ten business days. ICEH is the overall winner and entitled to 75% of its costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: Starbev GP Limited; Defendant: Interbrew Central European Holdings BV
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Post Judgment Consequential Rulings
- Outcome
- Declarations granted as per ICEH and Starbev's submissions; payment order in favour of ICEH; permission to appeal granted; costs awarded to ICEH at 75%.
- Legal Topics
- Declaratory Relief, Interest on Judgment, Anti Avoidance Provisions, Excess Equity Return Calculation, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Starbev GP Limited
Claimant
Interbrew Central European Holdings BV
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Post Judgment Consequential Rulings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether breach of warranty claims should reduce the deemed Equity Return under anti-avoidance provisions
- 2 Proper calculation of Excess Equity Return and double recovery exclusion
- 3 Entitlement to contractual or statutory interest
Ratio Decidendi
The court ruled that the deemed Equity Return under the anti-avoidance provisions is calculated by reference to the actual amount withheld for breach of warranty claims, not the maximum possible exposure. For Excess Equity Return, only Equity Returns with respect to which an Excess Return Payment has already been made are excluded, based on factual occurrence. Contractual interest is not payable as the sums were disputed in good faith within ten business days. ICEH is the overall winner and entitled to 75% of its costs.
Court Disposition
Declarations granted as per ICEH and Starbev's submissions; payment order in favour of ICEH; permission to appeal granted; costs awarded to ICEH at 75%.
Orders
- ICEH is entitled to the declarations set out at paragraph 184 of the judgment.
- Starbev is entitled to a declaration on Excess Equity Return as submitted at trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment