Nokia Corp v Interdigital Technology Corp

Nokia Corp v Interdigital Technology Corp

A declaration of essentiality to ETSI constitutes a formulated claim sufficient to found jurisdiction for declaratory relief; the issues are properly defined and justiciable; the application to strike out or grant summary judgment fails as the action is not an abuse of process and there are properly defined issues.

Parties
Claimant: Nokia Corporation; Defendant: InterDigital Technology Corporation
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Service, Strike Out Claim, or Grant Summary Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Declaratory Relief, Essentiality of Patents, Standard Setting Bodies, FRAND Licensing, Jurisdiction, Summary Judgment, Striking Out Claims

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nokia Corporation

Claimant

InterDigital Technology Corporation

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Service, Strike Out Claim, or Grant Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant declaratory relief regarding essentiality of patents notified to ETSI
  2. 2 Whether the claim should be struck out or summary judgment granted against the claimant
  3. 3 Whether declarations of non-essentiality serve a useful purpose

Ratio Decidendi

A declaration of essentiality to ETSI constitutes a formulated claim sufficient to found jurisdiction for declaratory relief; the issues are properly defined and justiciable; the application to strike out or grant summary judgment fails as the action is not an abuse of process and there are properly defined issues.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application to set aside service, strike out claim, or grant summary judgment is refused