Amazon.Com, Inc v Interdigital Vc Holdings, Inc & Ors [2025] EWHC 2708 (Pat) (20 October 2025)
The court granted an interim ex parte anti-anti-suit injunction against InterDigital because there was a real and imminent risk that InterDigital would seek, without notice, to restrain Amazon from pursuing final RAND relief in the UK, which would undermine the English court's jurisdiction and/or be vexatious or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 2708 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: Amazon.com, Inc.; Claimant: Amazon Digital UK Limited; Claimant: Amazon Europe Core SARL; Claimant: Amazon EU SARL; Claimant: Amazon Technologies, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS; Defendant: InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS; Defendant: Thomson Licensing SAS; Defendant: Vantiva SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Patents Court Application for Anti Anti Suit Injunction (aasi) / Ex Parte Interim Application
- Outcome
- Interim ex parte anti-anti-suit injunction granted against InterDigital, pending a return date for inter partes hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Anti Anti Suit Injunctions, Standard Essential Patents (seps), Rand/frand Licensing, Jurisdiction, Comity
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amazon.com, Inc.
Claimant
Amazon Digital UK Limited
Claimant
Amazon Europe Core SARL
Claimant
Amazon EU SARL
Claimant
Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Claimant
InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.
Defendant
InterDigital, Inc.
Defendant
InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS
Defendant
InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.
Defendant
InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS
Defendant
Thomson Licensing SAS
Defendant
Vantiva SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patents Court Application for Anti Anti Suit Injunction (aasi) / Ex Parte Interim Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should grant an ex parte anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) to restrain InterDigital from seeking to restrain Amazon's pursuit of final RAND relief in the UK.
- 2 Whether the application should be heard ex parte and without notice to InterDigital.
- 3 Whether the requirements of comity and protection of the English court's jurisdiction justify interim AASI relief.
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted an interim ex parte anti-anti-suit injunction against InterDigital because there was a real and imminent risk that InterDigital would seek, without notice, to restrain Amazon from pursuing final RAND relief in the UK, which would undermine the English court's jurisdiction and/or be vexatious or oppressive. The relief was justified on both grounds and was limited in duration pending a prompt inter partes hearing. The order was carefully tailored to avoid interfering with substantive patent infringement proceedings in foreign courts and to respect comity.
Court Disposition
Interim ex parte anti-anti-suit injunction granted against InterDigital, pending a return date for inter partes hearing.
Orders
- InterDigital is restrained from seeking, pending the return date, to restrain, prevent, or prohibit Amazon from pursuing final RAND relief, the AASI application, the continuation application, and/or the expedition application in the UK proceedings, in any court worldwide.
- InterDigital is restrained from requiring Amazon to withdraw such claims or seeking to penalise Amazon for pursuing them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment