Amazon.com Inc & Ors v Interdigital VC Holdings Inc & Ors [2026] EWHC 499 (Pat) (05 March 2026)
The court permits Amazon to make the declaration required by the UPC Local Division, acknowledging that this is not a declaration required or enforceable by the UK court, but is necessary to avoid further sanctions from the UPC. The court declines to make any order of its own motion against InterDigital, noting that the September RAND trial will not include Amazon's claim for damages as it relates to UPC territories. The court expresses reservations about the UPC LD's approach, finding it unfair and disruptive to the UK proceedings, but concludes that further conflict should be avoided and any remaining challenge should proceed by appeal within the UPC.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 499 (Pat)
- Parties
- Claimant: Amazon.com, Inc.; Claimant: Amazon Digital UK Limited; Claimant: Amazon Europe Core SARL; Claimant: Amazon EU SARL; Claimant: Amazon Technologies, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS; Defendant: InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.; Defendant: InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS; Defendant: Thomson Licensing SAS; Defendant: Vantiva SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Patent Infringement and Contractual Dispute / Interlocutory Judgment on Anti Suit Injunctions and Case Management
- Outcome
- Permission granted for Amazon to make the declaration required by the UPC Local Division; no further order made against InterDigital; RAND trial to proceed without damages claim for UPC territories.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, FRAND Licensing, Standard Essential Patents (seps), Jurisdictional Conflicts, Comity, Case Management, International Judicial Cooperation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Amazon.com, Inc.
Claimant
Amazon Digital UK Limited
Claimant
Amazon Europe Core SARL
Claimant
Amazon EU SARL
Claimant
Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Claimant
InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc.
Defendant
InterDigital, Inc.
Defendant
InterDigital Madison Patent Holdings SAS
Defendant
InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.
Defendant
InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS
Defendant
Thomson Licensing SAS
Defendant
Vantiva SA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Patent Infringement and Contractual Dispute / Interlocutory Judgment on Anti Suit Injunctions and Case Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the UPC Local Division's anti-suit injunction (ASI) prevents Amazon from pursuing final RAND relief in the UK proceedings
- 2 Whether Amazon is in breach of the UPC LD ASI
- 3 Whether the UK court should permit Amazon to make a declaration required by the UPC LD
Ratio Decidendi
The court permits Amazon to make the declaration required by the UPC Local Division, acknowledging that this is not a declaration required or enforceable by the UK court, but is necessary to avoid further sanctions from the UPC. The court declines to make any order of its own motion against InterDigital, noting that the September RAND trial will not include Amazon's claim for damages as it relates to UPC territories. The court expresses reservations about the UPC LD's approach, finding it unfair and disruptive to the UK proceedings, but concludes that further conflict should be avoided and any remaining challenge should proceed by appeal within the UPC.
Court Disposition
Permission granted for Amazon to make the declaration required by the UPC Local Division; no further order made against InterDigital; RAND trial to proceed without damages claim for UPC territories.
Orders
- Amazon permitted to make the declaration required by the UPC LD in the UK court.
- No order of the court against InterDigital at this stage, but right to reconsider reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment