Sigma Finance Corp, Re
The majority held that the natural and ordinary meaning of clause 7.6 of the STD required the Security Trustee to pay Short Term Liabilities falling due during the Realisation Period on a first-in-time basis, using available assets, so far as possible, and that the clause did not require pari passu or pro rata distribution among all creditors. The drafting and structure of the STD did not support importing a pro rata or pari passu regime during the Realisation Period, and the court's role was to interpret, not rewrite, the commercial bargain.
- Parties
- Appellant: Interested Party B; Appellant: Interested Party C; Appellant: Interested Party D; Respondent: Interested Party A; Respondent: Administrative Receivers; Respondent: Security Trustee
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Companies Court)
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed (by majority)
- Legal Topics
- Structured Investment Vehicles, Security Trust Deeds, Priority of Creditors, Interpretation of Commercial Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Interested Party B
Appellant
Interested Party C
Appellant
Interested Party D
Appellant
Interested Party A
Respondent
Administrative Receivers
Respondent
Security Trustee
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Companies Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of clause 7.6 of the Security Trust Deed (STD) governing priority and payment of liabilities during the Realisation Period in an insolvency of a structured investment vehicle (SIV)
- 2 Whether liabilities falling due during the Realisation Period are to be paid on a first-in-time basis, pari passu, or pro rata with all other liabilities
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the natural and ordinary meaning of clause 7.6 of the STD required the Security Trustee to pay Short Term Liabilities falling due during the Realisation Period on a first-in-time basis, using available assets, so far as possible, and that the clause did not require pari passu or pro rata distribution among all creditors. The drafting and structure of the STD did not support importing a pro rata or pari passu regime during the Realisation Period, and the court's role was to interpret, not rewrite, the commercial bargain.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed (by majority)
Orders
- Appeals by Parties B, C, and D dismissed; order of Sales J affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment