MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA & Ors v Interglobal Technologies Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 1464 (Comm) (01 May 2025)
The Defendants are bound by the exclusive English jurisdiction and law clauses in the bills of lading by operation of English law and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992. The Nigerian proceedings are in breach of those clauses. There are no strong reasons to refuse or set aside the anti-suit injunction: Nigerian law is irrelevant to the validity of the jurisdiction clause; the Claimants have not submitted to Nigerian jurisdiction; and there was no material failure of disclosure. The anti-suit injunction is continued and an anti-anti-suit injunction is granted to restrain further Nigerian proceedings interfering with the English court's orders.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 1464 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S. A.; Claimant: Mediterranean Shipping Company Nigeria Ltd; Claimant: MV MSC Lipsia III; Defendant: Interglobal Technologies Limited; Defendant: Interglobal Construction Ltd; Defendant: Zhengzhou Sanqgroup Machinery and Equipment Co. Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Application (anti Suit Injunction and Anti Anti Suit Injunction) / Adjourned Return Date Hearing on Interim Injunctions
- Outcome
- Interim anti-suit injunction continued to trial; anti-anti-suit injunction granted; Defendants' application to discharge/set aside refused.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Jurisdiction Clauses, Carriage of Goods by Sea, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Full and Frank Disclosure, Forum Non Conveniens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company S. A.
Claimant
Mediterranean Shipping Company Nigeria Ltd
Claimant
MV MSC Lipsia III
Claimant
Interglobal Technologies Limited
Defendant
Interglobal Construction Ltd
Defendant
Zhengzhou Sanqgroup Machinery and Equipment Co. Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application (anti Suit Injunction and Anti Anti Suit Injunction) / Adjourned Return Date Hearing on Interim Injunctions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should continue an interim anti-suit injunction restraining Nigerian proceedings in breach of an exclusive jurisdiction clause in English law bills of lading
- 2 Whether the defendants are bound by the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the bills of lading
- 3 Whether there are strong reasons to refuse or set aside the anti-suit injunction, including arguments based on Nigerian law, forum non conveniens, or alleged submission to Nigerian jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendants are bound by the exclusive English jurisdiction and law clauses in the bills of lading by operation of English law and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992. The Nigerian proceedings are in breach of those clauses. There are no strong reasons to refuse or set aside the anti-suit injunction: Nigerian law is irrelevant to the validity of the jurisdiction clause; the Claimants have not submitted to Nigerian jurisdiction; and there was no material failure of disclosure. The anti-suit injunction is continued and an anti-anti-suit injunction is granted to restrain further Nigerian proceedings interfering with the English court's orders.
Court Disposition
Interim anti-suit injunction continued to trial; anti-anti-suit injunction granted; Defendants' application to discharge/set aside refused.
Orders
- The interim anti-suit injunction restraining the Defendants from pursuing the Nigerian proceedings is continued until trial or further order.
- The Defendants are restrained from bringing or pursuing any proceedings in Nigeria seeking to restrain, terminate, sanction, or otherwise interfere with the English anti-suit injunction (anti-anti-suit injunction granted).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment