Nakanishi Kikai Kogyosho Ltd. v Intermare Transport GmbH
The court found that Intermare had a real prospect of establishing at trial that NKK was a party to the charterparties and that Mr. Watanabe had at least ostensible authority to bind NKK. The factual context was too unclear and disputed for summary judgment to be appropriate.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nakanishi Kikai Kogyosho Limited; Defendant: Intermare Transport GMBH
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Arbitration/contractual Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment Under Section 72 of the Arbitration Act, 1996
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment refused
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Arbitration Agreements, Authority of Agents, Identity of Contracting Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nakanishi Kikai Kogyosho Limited
Claimant
Intermare Transport GMBH
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Arbitration/contractual Dispute / Application for Summary Judgment Under Section 72 of the Arbitration Act, 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Nakanishi Kikai Kogyosho Limited (NKK) was a party to the arbitration agreements in the charterparties
- 2 Whether Mr. Watanabe had actual or ostensible authority to bind NKK to the charterparties
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Intermare had a real prospect of establishing at trial that NKK was a party to the charterparties and that Mr. Watanabe had at least ostensible authority to bind NKK. The factual context was too unclear and disputed for summary judgment to be appropriate.
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment refused
Orders
- Application for summary judgment by NKK refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment