Esso Petroleum Company Ltd. v Addison & Ors

Esso Petroleum Company Ltd. v Addison & Ors

Licensees were contractually obliged under each form of licence agreement to participate in the Esso Collection promotion at their own expense, including bearing costs of gifts and vouchers. Even if not, participation with knowledge of the scheme terms created a binding 'scheme contract'. Esso was entitled to adjust margins, fees, and allowances at its discretion, subject only to not acting arbitrarily, capriciously, dishonestly, irrationally, or making operation commercially impossible. Contracts for sale of fuel were for observed volumes measured at the terminal, not standard litres.

Parties
Claimant: Esso Petroleum Company Limited; Defendants: David and Christine Addison and others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Final Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for claimant on generic issues; individual claims to be determined separately.
Legal Topics
Interpretation of Licence Agreements, Implied Terms, Group Litigation, Sale of Goods, Promotional Schemes, Margin and Fee Adjustments, Industry Practice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Esso Petroleum Company Limited

Claimant

David and Christine Addison and others

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Commercial Dispute / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether licensees were contractually bound to participate in the Esso Collection promotion and bear associated costs
  2. 2 Whether a separate 'scheme contract' arose by conduct
  3. 3 Whether Esso was entitled to adjust margins, fees, and allowances under the licence agreements

Ratio Decidendi

Licensees were contractually obliged under each form of licence agreement to participate in the Esso Collection promotion at their own expense, including bearing costs of gifts and vouchers. Even if not, participation with knowledge of the scheme terms created a binding 'scheme contract'. Esso was entitled to adjust margins, fees, and allowances at its discretion, subject only to not acting arbitrarily, capriciously, dishonestly, irrationally, or making operation commercially impossible. Contracts for sale of fuel were for observed volumes measured at the terminal, not standard litres.

Court Disposition

Judgment for claimant on generic issues; individual claims to be determined separately.

Orders

  • Licensees are liable to pay Esso sums properly debited to their accounts in respect of gifts and vouchers under the promotion.
  • Esso's adjustments to margins, fees, and allowances between January 1996 and January 1998 were valid under the licence agreements.