"Krysia" Maritime Inc v Intership Ltd

"Krysia" Maritime Inc v Intership Ltd

The claimant is the party that really won at trial; there is no principle or rule in Admiralty or under the CPR that costs must be apportioned in line with liability where there is no counterclaim; the general rule in CPR Pt 44.3(2)(a) applies and the claimant is entitled to all its costs; the facts of this case do not justify an issues-based or proportionate costs order.

Parties
Claimant: KRYSIA Maritime Inc; Defendant: Intership Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 August 2008
Procedural Posture
Admiralty / Post Liability Judgment; Costs Determination
Outcome
Costs order in favour of the claimant; parties settled the amount of costs.
Legal Topics
Apportionment of Liability, Costs Orders, Contributory Negligence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

KRYSIA Maritime Inc

Claimant

Intership Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Admiralty / Post Liability Judgment; Costs Determination

  1. 1 Whether the successful claimant should recover all its costs where liability is apportioned due to contributory negligence and there is no counterclaim
  2. 2 Whether longstanding Admiralty practice on costs survives under the CPR

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant is the party that really won at trial; there is no principle or rule in Admiralty or under the CPR that costs must be apportioned in line with liability where there is no counterclaim; the general rule in CPR Pt 44.3(2)(a) applies and the claimant is entitled to all its costs; the facts of this case do not justify an issues-based or proportionate costs order.

Court Disposition

Costs order in favour of the claimant; parties settled the amount of costs.

Orders

  • Claimant entitled to all its costs of the liability hearing.