Nokia France SA v Interstone Trading Ltd & Ors
Mr. Yan wilfully failed to comply with court orders by deliberately withholding information about foreign assets, destroying and concealing relevant documents, and providing defective formal disclosure, thereby constituting contempt of court.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nokia France S. A.; Defendant: Interstone Trading Limited; Defendant: Capital Logistics Limited; Defendant: DVB Limited; Defendant: Simtel Communication Limited; Defendant: Vanguard PLC; Defendant: National Westminster Bank PLC; Defendant: Mark Tassell (trading as Prime Secretarial Services); Defendant: Jin Yan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Mr. Yan found in contempt of court for breaches of freezing and search orders.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Injunction, Search Order, Contempt of Court, Asset Disclosure, Fraud
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nokia France S. A.
Claimant
Interstone Trading Limited
Defendant
Capital Logistics Limited
Defendant
DVB Limited
Defendant
Simtel Communication Limited
Defendant
Vanguard PLC
Defendant
National Westminster Bank PLC
Defendant
Mark Tassell (trading as Prime Secretarial Services)
Defendant
Jin Yan
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Jin Yan failed to comply with freezing and search orders
- 2 Whether Mr. Jin Yan deliberately concealed or destroyed relevant documents
- 3 Whether Mr. Jin Yan failed to disclose assets and interests as required
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Yan wilfully failed to comply with court orders by deliberately withholding information about foreign assets, destroying and concealing relevant documents, and providing defective formal disclosure, thereby constituting contempt of court.
Court Disposition
Mr. Yan found in contempt of court for breaches of freezing and search orders.
Orders
- Application for committal justified; fuller information now provided; no coercive orders issued as substantial compliance achieved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment