Tradigrain SA & Ors v Intertek Testing Services (ITS) Canada Ltd. & Anor [2006] EWHC 778 (Comm) (10 April 2006)
The waiver of recourse clause is effective except in cases of gross negligence by formally appointed directors. No gross negligence was established against any board member of CBI or Mr Rackham. Therefore, the claim fails and no recourse is available against CBI under the insurance policy. The limitation clause, if applicable, would limit liability to fifteen times the monthly storage fee, but this issue does not arise due to the failure of the claim.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 778 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Tradigrain S.A.; Claimant: Societa Italiana Assicurazioni e Riassicurazioni (SIAT) S.p.A. and Others; Defendant: Intertek Testing Services (ITS) Canada Limited; Defendant: Caleb Brett India Pvt Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Claim for Damages (conversion and Breach of Contract) / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conversion, Gross Negligence, Waiver of Recourse, Limitation of Liability, Subrogation, Collateral Management Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tradigrain S.A.
Claimant
Societa Italiana Assicurazioni e Riassicurazioni (SIAT) S.p.A. and Others
Claimant
Intertek Testing Services (ITS) Canada Limited
Defendant
Caleb Brett India Pvt Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Claim for Damages (conversion and Breach of Contract) / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Interpretation of 'representative' in waiver of recourse clause under German law
- 2 Definition and application of 'gross negligence' under German law
- 3 Applicability and calculation of limitation of liability clause in CMA
Ratio Decidendi
The waiver of recourse clause is effective except in cases of gross negligence by formally appointed directors. No gross negligence was established against any board member of CBI or Mr Rackham. Therefore, the claim fails and no recourse is available against CBI under the insurance policy. The limitation clause, if applicable, would limit liability to fifteen times the monthly storage fee, but this issue does not arise due to the failure of the claim.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment