Investec Ltd. v Zulman & Anor
No binding agreement existed on 1 February 2007 as parties intended to be bound only upon execution of a written contract; costs of the appeal to be paid by appellant as the pleading issue was intertwined with the main issue.
- Parties
- Appellant: Investec Limited; Respondents: Zulman & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Costs in Litigation, Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Investec Limited
Appellant
Zulman & Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 whether an agreement was made on 1 February 2007
- 2 whether parties intended to be bound before written contract
- 3 costs allocation for pleading issue
Ratio Decidendi
No binding agreement existed on 1 February 2007 as parties intended to be bound only upon execution of a written contract; costs of the appeal to be paid by appellant as the pleading issue was intertwined with the main issue.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed
- respondent solicitors released from undertaking and restrictions on ₤80,000 and any interest earned
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment